Lease the space.
Or own the asset.
Put both strategies on one monthly cash-flow horizon—without collapsing financing, operating costs and residual equity into a misleading monthly-payment comparison.
Set one decision horizon.
Every starting value below is an editable scenario—not market data. The purchase is modelled as sold at the end of the lease term so the cost horizons align.
Occupancy commitment
Contract rent, recoveries, incentives, tenant capital and end-of-term cost.
Advanced lease cash assumptions +
Ownership scenario
Financing, operating costs, capital, appreciation and a hypothetical sale.
Advanced ownership assumptions +
Cash required, cost and residual equity.
- At the entered horizon, the purchase scenario has CAD 1,139,007.99 less modelled net cash cost after a hypothetical sale than the lease scenario.
- On the entered discount-rate basis, the lease scenario has the lower modelled present-value cost.
- This is a scenario comparison, not a recommendation. Control, flexibility, financing risk, residual-value risk, tax and operating needs remain separate decision dimensions.
What if the property were sold at each checkpoint?
Purchase cost includes the initial cash and monthly ownership outflows, less hypothetical net sale proceeds. This does not assume the lease can be terminated at each checkpoint.
No automatic “buy” or “lease” verdict.
The engine compares the assumptions entered. It excludes income tax, capital-cost allowance, financing renewal, GST/HST, property-sale tax and transaction-specific legal effects. Ownership control, flexibility, residual risk and operating fit require a separate decision framework and professional review.
Run the proposal through the full analyzer.
Compare escalations, additional rent, incentives, tenant capital and negotiated counters before using the lease as the occupancy baseline.