Renew the tenant.
Or re-lease the space.
See whether higher face rent pays for vacancy, free rent, TI, commission and landlord work—and when the cumulative cash flow actually catches up.
Price downtime and leasing capital.
Inputs are an editable scenario, not market data. Additional-rent recoveries are excluded from revenue so cost reimbursements are not presented as profit.
Lower downtime and capital scenario for the existing occupant.
Advanced landlord assumptions +
Market a vacant space, fund a new transaction and collect the entered new-tenant rent.
Advanced landlord assumptions +
Revenue after concessions, capital and vacancy.
- Re-tenant the space produces CAD 288,810.64 less modelled net lease cash flow over its entered timeline than Renew current tenant.
- Renew current tenant has the higher modelled present-value net cash flow at the entered discount rates.
- The comparison is a proposal-economics scenario, not a valuation, rent forecast or recommendation about tenant selection.
See when higher face rent catches the transaction cost.
Each strategy includes its own entered vacancy period, concessions, TI, commission, landlord work and property-cost shortfall.
Lease-month when collected base rent less entered shortfall recovers modelled leasing capital.
Measured after the entered vacancy period and from the new commencement.
Additional modelled capital required by Strategy B compared with Strategy A.
Proposal economics—not a property valuation.
The engine excludes financing, income tax, terminal property value, tenant credit, default risk, recoveries, market-rent forecasts and legal enforceability. Use it to isolate transaction economics, then apply the owner's actual investment, leasing and risk framework.
See the economics from both sides.
Use the flagship analyzer to normalize the tenant's occupancy cost, then return here to test the owner's transaction economics.